I often ask teachers where they go for good ideas – who they see as their professional leaders. Sometimes I provide them with a list of sources for improving their teaching and ask them which they regard as the most important – the list might include professional reading, university lecturers, school principals, professional learning courses, and so on.
Their responses are always the same. They say other teachers by far. Which leaves me wondering; how well do we ensure working conditions capitalize on the idea that teachers value most what they learn from other teachers?
For me, building a professional community is basically about building on this knowledge; it’s about increasing the frequency of opportunities for teachers to learn from each other as a routine part of work, especially through conversations based on concrete evidence about each other’s practice and student work samples. But we must reduce workloads it we want this to become a reality.
My definition of a professional community is a simple one; a group of professionals who regularly and systematically use evidence to review how well their practices align with current professional standards and meet the needs of students.
The research is clear; it is mainly by strengthening their schools as professional communities that school leaders improve the quality of teaching and student outcomes. Schools with a strong professional culture are characterised by shared norms and values, a focus on student learning, collaborative approaches to work, reflective inquiry into teaching practices and deprivatisation of practice.
Deprivatisation is the key. A group of teachers become a strong professional community when they commit to working together in ways that deprivatise their practice in a range of ways. They thereby increase opportunities to learn from each other; to review and improve each other’s practice. A rigorous and well-rewarded external professional certification system reinforces these practices.
Strong professional communities are accountable communities. They are comfortable providing colleagues with examples of how their practice matches high professional standards; for example in staff seminars. They accept that the evaluation of practice is not just a responsibility of school management. Professional communities take action to rectify practices that are less than optimal for students.