Preamble
Certification of Highly Accomplished and Lead teachers at the higher career stages enhances the professionalism of teachers by recognising the quality of their teaching and supporting career progression. The Framework for the Certification of Highly Accomplished and Lead Teachers (the Framework) will ensure certification of teachers is rigorous and based on the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (Teacher Standards), noting the way in which certified teachers may be recognised or financially rewarded is an employment matter.
Purposes
Certification of Highly Accomplished and Lead teachers has three primary purposes:
- to recognise and promote quality teaching;
- to provide an opportunity for teachers to reflect on their practice;
- to provide a reliable indication of quality teaching that can be used to identify, recognise, deploy and reward Highly Accomplished and Lead teachers.
By contributing to teacher quality, the certification of Highly Accomplished and Lead teachers will help to achieve the national goals for schooling expressed in the Alice Springs (Mparntwe) Education Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians1.
Principles
The proposed approach to the certification of Highly Accomplished and Lead teachers is informed by the following principles:
Standards-based: Certification is awarded against the Teacher Standards. It represents an assessment against the Teacher Standards, independent of any use it might then be put to by teachers, their employers, or others.
Student-improvement focused: Certification recognises those teachers who are highly effective in improving student outcomes. Evidence of student outcomes is central to certification processes. Student outcomes are broadly defined and include student learning, engagement in learning and wellbeing.
Development driven: Certification is part of a wider career development approach that includes professional learning, performance assessment and development. Participation in certification processes should be a positive experience for applicants and provide useful feedback that further enhances development and learning, including for those teachers who do not achieve certification.
Credible: Certification is credible when assessments of teacher performance are based on rigorous, valid, reliable, fair and transparent measures and processes. The evaluation of teacher practice will be based on consistent application and moderation of these processes, and multiple methods and sources of evidence. Consistency of judgements will be maintained across the diverse contexts where teachers work, so that context does not disadvantage any applicant.
Evidence-based: Certification processes must be built on nationally and internationally recognised best practice and contribute to the development of evidence about what works in promoting and recognising teacher quality.
Fit for purpose: Certification processes will incorporate the context and perspectives of stakeholders such as employers, certifying authorities/bodies, professional teacher bodies, unions, teachers and relevant educational researchers.
Streamlined: Certification processes will be as streamlined as possible, minimising the administrative burden on applicants while ensuring rigour of assessment against the Teacher Standards. Certification processes should be integrated into teachers’ daily practice to help prevent duplication or unnecessary additional work in the application process.