Quality assurance

Ensuring that Accreditation Standards and Procedures are being effectively and consistently applied across Australia and will raise and maintain the quality of initial teacher education programs and assure the quality of graduates.

Progress

Use left and right arrows to navigate between tabs.

Outcomes

Delivery of Becoming an ITE accreditation panellist, the national learning program for assessment and accreditation of initial teacher education programs.

Performance indicators

1. Accreditation panel members have undertaken the national learning program Becoming an ITE accreditation panellist (as at December 2019)

Panellists that have completed Becoming an ITE accreditation panellist

0 STAGE ONE LEARNING PROGRAM
0 STAGE TWO LEARNING PROGRAM
0 PANEL CHAIR LEARNING PROGRAM

2. Accreditation panel members perceptions confirm that Becoming an ITE accreditation panellist has provided the necessary skills and knowledge to fulfil their role

 


Click/hover to interact with graph

 

Outcomes

Assessment and accreditation of ITE programs is done to a rigorous standard

Performance indicator

Perceptions of ITE providers and accreditation panels confirm that programs are being rigorously assessed against the Program Standards

AITSL will use the annual panel review process to continue to seek feedback on the extent to which ITE providers and panellists perceive that ITE programs are being rigorously assessed against the Program Standards.

When will we know more?

The most recent panel review was finalised in 2019. Data from this review will be actioned in 2020.

Outcomes

Consistency in assessment of ITE programs between and within states and territories

Performance indicators

1. Accreditation panel members perceptions confirm the assessment of ITE programs is consistent across panels and states/territories

AITSL will use the annual panel review process to continue to seek feedback on the extent to which panellists perceive that ITE programs are being consistently assessed across panels and state/territories.

2. Standard setting and comparability processes demonstrate a high degree of consistency in decision-making of accreditation panels

Amendments agreed to by the Education Council in June 2018 will give AITSL greater scope to support consistency in decision making, including leading a standard setting process and establishing what it means to meet the accreditation standards. In late 2018, a Standard Setting Advisory Group (SSAG) was established by AITSL to provide independent advice to the organisation on a range of standards-based assessment processes.

A methodology aiming to achieve sound national consistency on what it means to meet the Accreditation Standards was developed by AITSL and agreed to by the SSAG and ITE stakeholders in early 2019.

As part of this methodology, nationally trained panellists and panel chairs, along with jurisdictional Executive Officers, were brought together for a series of four workshops from June to December in 2019. During these workshops, panellists assessed examples of accreditation applications using the Guidelines for the accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia. The data gathered through these workshops will be analysed to identify areas for improvement in the assessment of ITE accreditation applications, including revisions to the Accreditation Guidelines and accreditation panel training.

When will we know more?

The quantitative and qualitative data from the workshops is being analysed and will be used to developed draft revised Accreditation Guidelines. These revised Guidelines will be further workshopped by key ITE stakeholders in a series of workshops in early 2020.